Discover How Independent Advocacy Improves Patient Safety in Ireland

On World Patient Safety Day 2025, the theme “Safe Care for Every Newborn and Every Child” highlights a simple truth: safety begins with listening, respect, and partnership. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that as many as 4 in 10 patients are harmed in primary and ambulatory settings, while up to 80% of this harm can be avoided. Unsafe care ranks among the top 10 leading causes of death and disability worldwide.
Source: WHO Patient Safety

Against this backdrop, the role of independent advocacy becomes more urgent. In Ireland, Georgina Cruise, National Manager of the Patient Advocacy Service, leads a team providing free, independent, and confidential advocacy to patients and families in acute hospitals and nursing homes. Her team supports people making complaints, navigating patient safety incidents, and regaining dignity in the aftermath of harm.

In this blog, you'll discover:

• Why independent advocacy improves safety

• Importance of making families real partners in safety

• What patients are telling us

• Frameworks, laws, and the gap in implementation

• The future of advocacy

Why Independent Advocacy Improves Safety

At the heart of advocacy is the belief that patient voices matter. As Georgina explained in our interview:

“What we see within our service is that that piece of independent advocacy really does promote safer patient care, and it does that by giving patients a voice. We support patients in communicating their wishes, their needs, and expressing their fears. We ensure, and help them to ensure that their own voices are heard and that they're central to those decisions that are being made around their care.”

This empowerment model has real impact. Globally, WHO’s Patient Safety Action Plan 2021–2030 emphasises engaging and empowering patients as one of its seven key objectives.

Speaking of how they conduct their important work on behalf of patients, Georgina explains:

“As a service, we also look at the systemic advocacy piece. So the more data we collect, the more opportunity there is for us to identify themes and inconsistencies. And that could be a policy and procedural application. And it does give us the opportunity then to raise concerns with relevant stakeholders about potential safety issues, such as poor communications or problems with care delivery.”

In other words, individual complaints feed into system-wide learning. WHO and OECD studies show that without such mechanisms, complaints remain isolated events, with lessons lost. Independent advocacy turns them into drivers of change.

Real improvements have already emerged in Ireland through advocacy-supported complaints. As Georgina noted, cases have led to the introduction of emergency early warning systems, daily nurse manager rounds, improved note-taking systems, and updated communication training. Each of these interventions is not unique to Ireland — they mirror the World Health Organization’s global patient safety strategies, which highlight early detection, effective communication, and strong documentation as critical levers for preventing harm. By embedding these changes in local practice, patient advocacy is helping Ireland contribute to the broader international goal of reducing avoidable harm worldwide.

Making Families Real Partners in Safety

The WHO consistently highlights the need to involve families as equal partners in safety. Georgina has seen how transformative this can be:

“Having that compassionate, empathetic, open and transparent engagement is really vital in that process. Having the opportunity for the person to share their lived experience, feel listened to, and for that learning piece that follows from complaints or patient safety incidents. It really does go a long way to support that ongoing trust in the service and empower the person in their ongoing care.”

Practical steps include:

• Asking families directly: “What matters to you?”

• Providing jargon-free communication and easy-read materials.

• Involving families in care planning from the beginning.

• Creating safe, judgment-free channels for raising concerns.

• Recognising cultural values and tailoring care accordingly.

These measures align with WHO’s call for patient and family engagement at all levels of health systems, from individual care planning to policy design.

What Patients Are Telling Us

In 2024 alone, the Patient Advocacy Service handled 2,100 inquiries, raising more than 6,500 separate complaint issues. Georgina described how they analyse these cases using a structured tool from the London School of Economics, breaking down issues by severity and type.

The findings?

“Communication is an element of about 60% of what we see. Staff spoke in a condescending manner, questions acknowledged and not responded to, or patients not involved in their care plan. Anxiety being acknowledged but not addressed is a huge issue. Patients not monitored properly, aspects of care plans being overlooked, and then patients provided information dismissed, which can all impact on the patient safety piece.””

These themes are not unique to Ireland. A 2023 analysis in Annals of Internal Medicine found that at least 10% of patient safety incidents worldwide stem from communication failures between healthcare workers, patients, and caregivers. Long waits, dismissive attitudes, and lack of involvement are reported across health systems, whether high-income or low-income.

By capturing data systematically and amplifying patient voices, the Patient Advocacy Service transforms frustration into learning. This is exactly what the WHO’s Global Patient Safety Observatory calls for: turning patient complaints into evidence-based policy change.

Frameworks, Laws, and the Gap in Implementation

Ireland has strong frameworks, from the HSE’s Framework for Improving Quality to the Open Disclosure Policy. But Georgina points to a familiar problem:

“Through our work, we’ve seen that there is room for improvement and it is around consistency of implementation of these frameworks and the legislation across all the services. And that’s about ensuring as well that they’re patient-centered and that there’s a proactive piece there rather than a reactive piece when anything goes wrong.”

Georgina’s observation reflects what has emerged in global patient safety research: legal and policy frameworks are increasingly common, but their effective, consistent application often falls short at the local or frontline level. The WHO Global Patient Safety Report 2024 reveals this gap clearly. Many countries have adopted national patient safety laws, strategies, or policies, yet far fewer report that these policies are implemented comprehensively across all health-care settings, or maintained with fidelity over time

The Future of Advocacy

The Patient Advocacy Service as a nationally commissioned independent advocacy service  in Ireland is only five years old, but it is evolving fast. Georgina sees a stronger, more collaborative future:

“From the very start to now, we have seen that patient advocacy is evolving. And I think it’s evolving into a more empowering and collaborative bridge between patients and decision makers or service providers. It’s backed in some ways by the legislation and the frameworks and policies. … There is a greater focus on that person-centered care, that human rights-based approach, rather than that patriarchal best interest care. And I think that will improve safety as it goes along.”

She also points to current and upcoming developments:

• Embedding the Assisted Decision-Making Capacity Act, which supports  a person’s capacity in making their own  — even difficult ones —  promoting autonomy and self-determination.

• The commencement of the Patient Safety (Notifiable Incidents and Open Disclosure) Act 2023 which introduces a legal requirement for Open Disclosure following a serious notifiable incident and will ensure that patients and their families are informed of any such incidents and are included in any subsequent investigations. The health or social care service is mandated to make an apology and provide information on what has happened.

• The review of the HSE’s Incident Management Framework and “Your Service, Your Say” Complaints Policy.  

• New patient councils at regional and national levels, embedding patient voices in the HSE.

• Greater visibility of advocacy in hospitals and nursing homes, so patients and families know where to turn when raising concerns.

Globally, this trajectory aligns with WHO’s goal of making patients co-designers of health systems, not passive recipients of care.

Final Reflection

On World Patient Safety Day, it is easy to focus on frameworks, checklists, and policies. But as Georgina Cruise reminds us, the patient voice is itself a safety tool.

“By empowering patients to advocate for themselves, we not only resolve issues — we create a safer, more respectful healthcare system for all.”

Independent advocacy bridges the gap between patients and systems. It turns individual complaints into collective learning. And when patients, families, advocates, and providers work together, safer care for every newborn, every child, and every person becomes not just an aspiration, but a reality.

If you are interested in discovering how MEG can support your organisation in embedding patient safety into everyday practice, our team is here to help.

Insights from Dr. Maureen Flynn on World Patient Safety Day 2025

Patient safety is at the heart of quality healthcare, and in Ireland, the Health Service Executive (HSE) is taking meaningful steps to embed safety, collaboration, and learning into everyday practice.

For 2025, the theme is “Safe Care for Every Newborn and Every Child” with a special focus on those from birth to nine years old. The slogan “Patient safety from the start!” highlights the urgent need to act early and consistently to prevent harm during childhood.

Research shows that in neonatal intensive care, between 0.7 and 2.4 adverse events occur per admission, with up to 97% considered preventable. In paediatric intensive care units, about one in six children experience an Adverse Drug Event, and more than half of these events could have been prevented. These figures highlight the importance of early action and robust patient safety measures to protect the most vulnerable patients
Source: WHO

To mark this important awareness day, we spoke with Dr. Maureen Flynn, Director of Nursing, Quality and Patient Safety Lead at the HSE, to learn more about why this year’s theme matters, the tools available to support staff, and her vision for the future of patient safety in Ireland.

In this blog, you'll discover:

• Why World Patient Safety Day 2025 matters

• How the HSE Quality and Patient Safety Competency Navigator supports staff

• Why shared learning is critical for safer care

• The role of EQUIPS in connecting research to practice

• Dr. Flynn’s vision for patient safety in Ireland

Why World Patient Safety Day 2025 Matters

Each year, World Patient Safety Day provides an opportunity to raise awareness, foster collaboration, and mobilise global action to improve patient safety.

Children are particularly vulnerable because their bodies and systems are still developing. In Ireland, studies and HSE data indicate that around one in eight hospital admissions involve an adverse event, with a substantial proportion considered preventable.
Source: HSE

On 17 September 2025, HSE marked World Patient Safety Day  with its third National Patient and Public Partnership Conference at Croke Park, highlighting co-design with families and communities - a core principle of both the World Health Organisation Global Patient Safety Action Plan (2021–2030)and Ireland’s strategy.

Building Skills with the Quality and Patient Safety Competency Navigator

In Ireland, one of the HSE’s most innovative tools is the Quality and Patient Safety (QPS) Competency Navigator, developed in partnership with University College Dublin, and patient partners.

This interactive resource helps staff, students, and leaders identify their strengths and gaps across six key competency areas:

The Navigator allows users to self-assess, plan professional development, and access curated toolkits and resources. Importantly, it’s free and available to everyone—healthcare professionals, educators, and even patient partners.

“It’s called a competency navigator because it’s not for once off use. It’s to be used across your healthcare journey, whether you’re a student, a staff member, a leader, a policymaker, or a faculty teacher of quality and patient safety.””

This tool aligns with the World Health Organisation’s global push for capacity building and education as outlined in their Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021–2030 towards Zero Patient Harm in Health care. One of the seven strategic objectives in the framework for action is to  “Build high-reliability systems and a competent health workforce.” You can view the full action plan here. 

Practical Tools for Real Change

Beyond the Navigator, the HSE Quality Improvement Toolkit offers a structured, six-step approach to tackling issues in care delivery—from identifying problems and measuring outcomes to testing and sustaining change.

With 17 practical tools and real-world case studies, it empowers staff to turn feedback, audits, or incident reports into meaningful improvements.

Another example of practical tools is the clinical audit toolkit developed and tested for nurse referral for radiological procedures in collaboration with the HSE National Centre for Clinical Audit

The Importance of Shared Learning

Healthcare is too complex for any one team or hospital to tackle safety challenges in isolation. The HSE’s Patient Safety Together creates a platform for rapid learning across Ireland through:

• HSE National Patient Safety Alerts (NPSAs) for issuing priority which requires HSE services and HSE funded agencies to take specific action(s) within an identified timeframe. 

• Patient Safety Supplements sharing and raising awareness of quality and patient safety information

• HSE Patient Safety Digests that collate research and regulatory updates

• Quarterly community events for frontline staff to exchange insights

• Patient safety stories that highlight real experiences and improvements

By fostering a culture of openness and collaboration, the HSE is building a stronger, safer healthcare system.

“The HSE is the largest employer in Ireland. So you can just think of the volume of care being delivered. We all have our own experiences. We come across incidents, we all learn, but how do we share? So the Patient Safety Together community is a mechanism of doing that sharing nationally”

The scale of the challenge makes such mechanisms vital. In 2024, over 109,300 adverse incidents were reported across the HSE, including 497 classified as “extreme” and 158 as “major” events. While most incidents caused little or no harm, the numbers show just how important it is to learn quickly and share lessons widely. By creating HSE NPSAs, supplements, national digests, quarterly calls informed by research, incident data and trends, the Patient Safety Together community and resources ensures that frontline staff do not have to “learn the hard way” in isolation, instead, reliable and trusted learning can be spread system-wide.

This mirrors the World Health Organisation’s call for learning health systems, where openness and transparency prevent the same mistake from being repeated in multiple places.
Source: RTE

EQUIPS: Connecting Research with Practice

Another powerful initiative Dr. Flynn is a part of is EQUIPS (Evidence-based Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Research Network). EQUIPS is a network funded by the HSE and the Health Research Board (HRB). It brings together frontline staff and patient voices with researchers, to inform QIPS research priorities and support the adoption of evidence-based change.

This is significant in the global context as the World Health Organisation have previously stressed that evidence must inform action, but too often research and practice remain disconnected. EQUIPS offers a model for closing that gap.

“So that’s the novelty of the EQUIPS network. It brings people from the frontline together with researchers and academics to undertake research, to disseminate research and to create that community.”

Too often, research findings remain in journals whilst frontline staff struggle with the same persistent problems. EQUIPS aims to coordinate and accelerate QIPS research. This networking approach is relatively novel and welcomed since World Health Organisation’s 2024 progress report on patient safety found that only around one-third of countries have managed to establish a strong culture of learning and safety. EQUIPS helps Ireland close this gap by championing, advocating for, and addressing research needs in a collaborative manner. By ensuring that evidence is not just generated but also disseminated and implemented, EQUIPS can accelerate the cycle from knowledge to practice.

A Vision for the Future

Looking ahead, Dr. Flynn emphasises patient partnership, health literacy, and co-production as central to advancing safety in Ireland.

The National Patient Safety Strategy (2019) outlines 13 priority areas—including medication safety, pressure ulcer prevention, infection control, and safeguarding. With a new strategy on the horizon, these focus areas will continue to guide national efforts.

“My immediate response is that the biggest focus is on patient partnership, co-design and co-production. Because we as patients and service users, whether we’re working in healthcare or not, have an enormous invested interest in the quality and safety of the care that we and our families receive and the care that we deliver.

So I think everything that we can do to nurture and support individual patient partnership and then patient partnering on quality improvement initiatives.”

This vision is also reflected in WHO’s findings that meaningful patient engagement can reduce preventable harm by up to 15%, while also restoring trust and dignity for families who experience safety incidents.
Source: WHO Patient Safety Key Facts

Final Reflection

As Dr. Flynn reminds us, patient safety is not just one day focus area —it’s an ongoing journey of learning, collaboration, and improvement.

Through HSE Ireland’s initiatives, from tools like the Competency Navigator to EQUIPS, Ireland is laying strong foundations for safer care

And with patients, families, and professionals working in partnership, the vision of safe care for every newborn and every child moves closer to reality.

“I’m really excited about World Patient Safety Day and look forward to hearing how people are marking this important day and also what they’re going to do. It’s not just one day. It’ll be for the rest of the year until the 17th of September in 2026.”

If you are interested in discovering how MEG can support your organisation in embedding patient safety into everyday practice, our team is here to help.

How MEG Strengthens Risk Oversight & Patient Safety in Every Role

From Governance to Frontline, One Connected View

Healthcare leaders share a common mission: reduce patient harm, meet regulatory requirements, and strengthen safety culture.

Yet risk oversight is often slowed by scattered systems, under-reporting, and delays in acting on insights. The result? missed risks, reactive inspections, and staff disengagement.

MEG’s Connected Quality & Safety Platform changes this. It gives every role,  from board to bedside a single, trusted view of quality and safety: issues are surfaced earlier, actions are tracked to closure, and inspection-readiness becomes the everyday state.

Executives & Directors

Lead with confidence and evidence

Board and executive leaders are accountable for safety culture, regulatory readiness, and organisational reputation. MEG equips them with real-time oversight and defensible data:

• Inspection-ready, always: With MEG, one provider reduced inspection prep time by 70+%. Instead of weeks spent compiling spreadsheets, leaders had a single dashboard with defensible records, ready for regulators.

• Governance underpinned by data: Track organisation-wide safety performance in real time, with evidence to show how issues were resolved.

• Reduce liability and reputational risk: Early warning dashboards flag patterns before they escalate.

• Defensible accountability: Every corrective action is tracked to closure with a timestamped audit trail, critical in litigation or board review.

““Since adopting MEG, we have experienced a significant improvement in our quality management practices. In a single platform, NSFT now has centralised all quality-related information, including clinical audits, pharmacy, and risks, saving us countless hours”. ”

— Tracey Holland, Chief Nursing Information Officer (CNIO) and Associate Director of Quality

---

Senior Managers

Eliminate delays in incident response and risk investigation

Operational leaders are measured by how quickly risks are addressed and closed. MEG gives them the tools to stay ahead:

• Audits are completed 60% faster, allowing risks to be fixed before they escalate.

• Action closure rates improved by 70% in one MEG pilot site, thanks to automated reminders, escalation workflows, and RAG flagging.

• Every incident is traceable: From assignment to resolution, MEG provides a timestamped audit trail that strengthens legal defensibility.

• Cross-department visibility: Share real-time compliance status without chasing data or email chains.

““Since adopting MEG’s software, we’ve seen clear improvements in compliance and risk management. Faster, more transparent audits mean risks are identified and resolved earlier, reducing escalation.

Staff feel empowered by the system’s clarity and support, while patients benefit from the assurance of safer, higher-standard care.””

— Louise Talisen, Deputy Director of Nursing for Quality & Accreditation within the Chief Nurse’s Office

---

Consultants & Advisors

Deliver measurable safety improvements, fast.

Consultants and advisors need to show results quickly. MEG is built for speed and flexibility:

• Deploy in days, not months: no complex EHR integration required.

• Tailor workflows to each client’s risk profile, local regulatory or accreditation needs, and cultural context.

• Provide boards with a complete, current view of organisational risk, driving informed decisions.

• In one acute hospital, MEG’s rollout drove a 300% increase in medication error reporting - not more harm, but more visibility of hidden risks. This enabled earlier interventions and strengthened safety culture.

““...MEG was chosen for its advanced reporting capabilities, organisation-wide dashboard view, ability to monitor compliance at every level, and real-time results, highlighting areas of potential risk.””

---

Benefits for All Roles

• Accessible anywhere: Easy to use and available on any device, even offline.

• All data, one view: Incidents, audits, risk registers, policies, training/credentialing, and patient experience & feedback are connected for a single source of truth.

• Proven globally: Trusted in 25+ countries across diverse care settings.

• Enterprise-grade assurance: HIPAA, GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 compliance.

Your Next Step

Every leader wants confidence that risks are surfaced early, actions are traceable, and governance is defensible.

See how MEG brings all your risk, compliance, and safety data into one connected view. Request a tailored demo to explore how the platform supports executives, managers, and frontline staff in strengthening oversight and accountability.

Top 3 Innovations Shaping Patient Safety in 2025

Accelerating safety with clear focus, responsibility, and prompt action.

Healthcare leaders understand that technology alone doesn’t make systems safer. What really counts is how innovations are used to provide staff with clarity, reinforce responsibility, and enable swifter responses. Here are three areas where providers are already experiencing measurable improvements.

1. Digitised Global Trigger Tool (GTT) Reviews

From paper delays to real-time learning

The Global Trigger Tool (GTT), developed by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), uses “triggers” - cues in patient records such as lab results, medications, or readmissions - to flag potential adverse events that might otherwise go unnoticed. Traditionally, GTT reviews have been manual and paper-based, taking weeks or months to complete.

A 2019 study in the International Journal for Quality in Health Care found that reviewing 1,000 records with the original manual GTT took 411 hours. With a digital approach, the same review required just 23 hours; that’s a 95% reduction in time (1). That’s the difference between waiting months for insight and having actionable findings in days.

➡️ How MEG helps:

• MEG’s Digital GTT module uses AI-powered trigger detection (via Gemini) to scan records and categorise potential adverse events in seconds.

• Quickly consolidates data from your EHR or other patient systems, even through a simple Excel upload, so leaders can access insights without waiting months for complex integration projects.

• Supports customisable trigger lists, so hospitals can tailor reviews to their services (e.g. obstetrics, oncology) 

• Provides live dashboards and action-tracking, giving leaders immediate visibility of themes and responses.

💡 Leadership lever: Faster, more consistent reviews free up hundreds of hours of clinical time and bring potential harm signals to safety committees while action can still be taken, strengthening governance and continuous improvement.

2. Keep Safety Actions on Track Automatically

From static logs to proactive prevention

The real risk isn’t just unreported incidents; it’s reported issues that never get resolved. Manual spreadsheets and emails make follow-up hard to monitor, leaving leaders in the dark. Smart, rule-based alerts and automated workflows change that.

➡️ How MEG helps:

• Assign actions immediately at the point of review, so ownership is clear from the start.

• Smart alerts and threshold triggers keep teams on track, while Red/Amber/Green flags make overdue or at-risk items visible at a glance.

• Automated escalations ensure nothing gets lost or delayed.

• Board-level KPI dashboards display real-time closure rates across departments, giving executives constant oversight.

• Providers using MEG have reported significantly reductions in average closure times in the first six months. At one pilot site, introducing automated escalations cut average ‘actions’ closure times by over 70%, a tangible leap in responsiveness.

💡 Leadership lever: Leaders can track closure rates as a live quality indicator, ensuring risks are not just logged but actively resolved, building accountability and resilience.

3. Turn Gaps and Feedback into Early Warnings

From fragmented data to proactive risk insight

Incidents show where harm or near misses have already occurred. But compliance data, risk registers, and patient complaints often highlight risks before they escalate into incidents. The challenge is that these sources are usually siloed. When they’re connected around a common identifier - such as a patient number, staff ID, or service area - leaders gain a clear, unified view of where vulnerabilities are emerging.

➡️ How MEG helps:

• Connect the dots with a common identifier: link compliance checks, policy compliance, training records, and complaint themes directly to incident data.

• Spot patterns quickly: dashboards reveal where compliance gaps overlap with incident trends, acting as early warning signals.

• Enable proactive decisions: department-level views help local leaders take corrective action, while committee-ready reports provide system-wide oversight without extra admin.

💡 Leadership lever: By linking disparate data sources, boards and safety leaders gain visibility into the underlying drivers of risk,  making it possible to intervene early and prevent issues before they result in harm.

Moving Forward

These innovations are not distant possibilities. They are already being used in leading healthcare organisations. By digitising reviews, automating follow-up, and connecting risk, compliance, feedback data (and more!), leaders are seeing faster insight, stronger accountability, and measurable improvements in patient safety.

👉 Want to explore how healthcare leaders are applying these innovations? Join us at any upcoming conferences we’re attending, or connect with us to share lessons learned and approaches that are working in practice.

3 Quick Wins to Strengthen Risk and Safety Reporting

Practical strategies healthcare leaders are using MEG for to surface risks earlier and respond faster

In healthcare, delays in incident reporting and risk escalation don’t just slow processes; they can mean missed opportunities to prevent harm. The good news: reducing those delays doesn’t require a system overhaul.

Across hospitals and care providers, leaders are seeing success with three simple, practical changes. Together, they shorten reporting time, improve follow-up, and strengthen safety culture.

---

Quick Win #1: Make Frontline Reporting Frictionless

Leadership lever: Reinforce reporting as a core safety practice. Celebrate staff who report proactively, even when outcomes are near misses.

➡️ How MEG helps:

• Easy-fill digital forms that adapt to the seriousness of the event: simple for minor issues, more detailed for higher-risk cases, saving staff time while capturing the right information.

• Staff can report anytime, anywhere via the MEG mobile app, logging an incident on any device in under 2 minutes.

• Built-in prompts and guidance ensure the right details are captured the first time, avoiding extra back-and-forth.

• Leaders can add commendation notes on incident records, reinforcing recognition.

• Use MEG’s 4Cs framework form (Compliments, Comments, Concerns, Complaints) to capture broader staff/patient feedback in the same platform.

💡 Impact: More incidents reported, fewer “I didn’t have time.” Reporting becomes accessible, efficient, and valued, encouraging earlier escalation of risks and stronger engagement.

Capture incident & event details on the move

Quick Win #2: Keep Follow-Up Actions Visible and On Track

Leadership lever: Use action/issue closure rates as a board-level quality indicator. Regularly review trends to ensure risks are mitigated, not just recorded.

➡️ How MEG helps:

• Follow-up actions can be assigned immediately at the point of review, ensuring accountability is clear from the start.

• Smart alerts and threshold-based triggers keep teams on track, while Red/Amber/Green status flags make overdue items instantly visible.

• Automated escalations ensure nothing gets lost in spreadsheets or inboxes.

• A board-level KPI dashboard provides real-time oversight of closure rates across departments.

💡 Impact: Faster closure rates, clear accountability, and stronger defensibility in audits or litigation, with leadership assured that risks are being actively mitigated, not just logged.

Comprehensive task management is built into MEG

Quick Win #3: Turn Gaps and Feedback into Early Warnings

Incidents tell you what happened, but compliance gaps, risk data, and complaints can reveal where problems are likely to happen next. Linking these sources together turns hindsight into foresight.

➡️ How MEG helps:

• Connect the dots with a common identifier: Compliance data (e.g., audits, unread policies, expired credentials), risk registers, and complaints can be linked to incidents when they share a unifying identifier such as a patient number, staff ID, or service area.

• Spot patterns early: Dashboards then highlight where gaps or feedback trends overlap with incidents, showing rising risk exposure.

• Support faster action: Department-level views help local leaders intervene before issues escalate, while committee-ready reports provide system-wide assurance.

💡 Impact: Instead of reacting only to incidents after they occur, leaders gain visibility into the underlying contributors, so they can act earlier, prevent recurrence, and strengthen safety culture.

Example: Linking a patient (number) with complaints, incidents and risks

These strategies don’t require a system overhaul; they can be rolled out in weeks, not years. With MEG, they’re built into one connected platform.

Want to see how healthcare providers are reporting faster, closing actions sooner, and spotting risks earlier with MEG?

[Part 3] From Compliance to Culture: How Healthcare Leaders Drive Improvement

💡 Free resources included at the end of this post: Download MEG’s Document Management Maturity Workbook and watch our on-demand webinar with Clare Harney and Leonora O’Brien.

---

In Part 1, we surfaced the “digital document graveyard” problem — policies uploaded but effectively buried, leaving frontline teams exposed and leaders firefighting avoidable risk.

In Part 2, we shifted to the solution: how integrated, healthcare-specific systems turn documents into a dynamic driver of quality and safety, tightening governance and putting the right version in the right hands at the point of care.

Now in Part 3, we take the leadership perspective. Drawing on insights from Clare Harney and Leonora O’Brien, we explore how directors of quality can move beyond tick-box compliance to build a culture of safety and accountability.

The Maturity Journey

Every organisation sits somewhere on the document management maturity curve, from basic storage, to controlled systems, to fully integrated and intelligence-driven quality management.

This is what we call the maturity journey. The five dimensions of maturity, access, versioning, governance, engagement, and integration, provide leaders with a practical way to measure where they are today, and where they need to go.

The 5 Dimensions of Document System Maturity

1. Access — From Hidden Files to Usable Guidance

• Level 1: Documents scattered, staff can’t reliably find what they need.

• Level 5: Intelligent search delivers the right policy at the right time.

Cultural impact: Access is about trust. If staff can’t find current SOPs, they fall back on habit or hearsay. When access is reliable, the message is clear: leaders care about enabling safe, consistent practice.

““When staff follow up-to-date, standardised protocols, care is safer and more predictable.”

”

— Clare Harney

2. Versioning — From Chaos to Confidence

• Level 1: Multiple uncontrolled versions in circulation.

• Level 5: Live versioning ensures a single, trusted source of truth.

Cultural impact: Consistency breeds confidence. When staff don’t trust documents, culture drifts into workarounds. Strong version control signals leadership discipline, what’s published is what’s practiced.

3. Governance — From Paper Trails to Real Accountability

• Level 1: No oversight, approvals undocumented.

• Level 5: Every approval, attestation, and change is tracked automatically.

Cultural impact: Governance is visible leadership. Transparent audit trails tell staff that leaders don’t just write policies, they own them. It reinforces accountability at every level.

““Every document action, who approved, who attested, and when, is tracked. That’s real governance.””

— Leonora O’Brien

4. Engagement — From Compliance Chasing to Shared Responsibility

• Level 1: Leaders can’t prove staff have read SOPs.

• Level 5: Engagement dashboards show who’s read, who’s attested, and who needs follow-up.

Cultural impact: Engagement isn’t about nagging. It’s about shifting responsibility from compliance officers to every team member. Leaders who measure engagement are actually measuring culture of accountability.

5. Integration — From Silos to System-Wide Insight

• Level 1: Policies, audits, risks, and training all managed in isolation.

• Level 5: A fully connected quality ecosystem, where documents, audits, incidents, and training are dynamically linked.

Cultural impact: Integration is about connectedness. Leaders gain a holistic view of quality and safety — how policies, risks, training, and incidents interact and influence each other. This isn’t “box-checking” across separate modules; it’s comprehensive oversight that allows leaders to anticipate issues, understand cause and effect, and make proactive improvements.

““With MEG, everything is dynamically linked … SOPs, audits, training — one source of truth that’s accessible and reliable.” ”

— Leonora O’Brien

Why Leaders Must Own the Maturity Journey

Moving up the maturity curve requires deliberate leadership. One of the biggest hurdles in the journey is migration: moving thousands of documents, often inconsistent, duplicated, or poorly tagged, out of legacy platforms like SharePoint and into a modern, integrated quality system. For many leaders, this feels daunting.

The key is to work with a vendor that has extensive experience in healthcare migrations. MEG has delivered this repeatedly, for example, DaVita International, a leading global provider of renal care operating over 400 centres across 13 countries, successfully migrated more than 5,000 documents into MEG through a streamlined process.

Migration isn’t just a technical task; it’s a leadership moment. It’s the opportunity to draw a line under fragmented systems, reset expectations, and set a higher standard of governance and culture. Done well, it becomes the first visible sign of change, showing staff that leaders are serious about moving beyond “document graveyards” to a culture of active quality improvement.

The Document Management Maturity Framework then provides the roadmap: benchmark your current state, define the target, and lead the organisation through each step of the journey.

This isn’t about IT. It’s about creating systems that staff can rely on and regulators can trust.

Practical Takeaways for Directors of Quality

• Make documents cultural, not clerical. Staff must experience them as everyday guidance, not admin files.

• Think holistically. Quality and safety require connectedness, not silos.

• Use migration as a cultural reset. A moment to leave behind bad habits and build accountability.

• Adopt the maturity framework. Progress step by step, from storage to governance, from compliance to culture.

Final Thought: From Storage to Leadership

Clare Harney put it simply: “You should be audit-ready at any time, not scrambling when inspectors arrive.”

That’s the essence of leadership in document management: creating systems that are always current, always accessible, and always aligned with safe care. For directors of quality, it’s not about storing documents, it’s about leading improvement.

📊 Next Step for Directors of Quality:

👉 [Click] Download the Document Management Maturity Workbook

👉 [Click] Watch the Document Management webinar with Clare & Leonora

👉 [Click] Book a leadership demo of MEG

[Part 2] Beyond Storage: Turning Documents into a Dynamic Driver of Quality and Safety

In Part 1, we explored the “digital document graveyard”, those legacy systems where policies sit online but remain effectively buried, inaccessible, and untrusted. We saw how SharePoint, static repositories, and clunky intranets expose organisations to clinical, compliance, and cultural risks.

In Part 2, we turn to the solution: how healthcare organisations can move beyond storage and build document systems that function as a dynamic driver of quality and safety, reducing risk, strengthening compliance, and empowering staff with the information they need, when they need it.

Why Storage Alone Fails

Traditional approaches, whether paper binders, SharePoint folders, or siloed platforms, often fail quality leaders in three important ways:

• Accountability gaps: Limited ability to prove staff have read and understood policies.

• Fragmentation: Documents disconnected from audits, incidents, and risk registers.

• Version confusion: Multiple versions in circulation, creating inconsistency and risk.

These issues don’t just slow governance teams down, they undermine inspection readiness and increase the risk of non-compliance.

From Storage to Quality Engine

Healthcare organisations are increasingly turning to integrated document management systems built for governance. One example is MEG’s Document Management Module, which illustrates how the shift from storage to active quality management looks in practice.

1. Integration Across Governance Functions

MEG brings documents, audits, risks, and incidents into one interoperable platform. This single source of truth reduces duplication, closes governance gaps, and ensures consistent oversight across the organisation.

2. Attestation and Accountability

Beyond distributing documents, the system tracks who has read and acknowledged them. Attestation reports show compliance by user, department, or facility, and automated reminders ensure gaps are closed.

Example of Attestation Records in MEG

3. AI-Enhanced Efficiency with Ask MEG

AI is most effective when applied to real-world problems. MEG’s in-built AI assistant - Ask MEG - allows staff to ask plain-English questions inside a policy, for example:

• “What PPE is required for a patient with C. diff?”

• “How do I escalate a safeguarding concern on night shift?”

The assistant responds instantly, with answers grounded in the live, approved document, never invented, always compliant.

For leaders, this means faster clarity for staff, fewer escalation delays, and evidence that policies are being understood and used.

4. Create, Collaborate, Control

Policies can be drafted, reviewed, and published within the system. Review cycles are automated, version control is enforced, and full audit trails capture every action, from approval to staff attestation.

An example of a MEG Docs publishing approval workflow

Importantly, MEG also supports a configurable publication process. Documents can include an optional review stage before final approval, giving teams more flexibility in how policies are checked and signed off. This ensures critical content is carefully reviewed by the right people before moving to formal approval and publication, improving both clarity and confidence in the process.

Comparison: MEG vs SharePoint vs Paper

Here’s how an integrated, healthcare-specific platform compares with legacy tools still used in many organisations:

While SharePoint and paper can provide basic document storage and a partial audit trail, they leave teams dependent on manual effort, vulnerable to errors, and unable to demonstrate governance reliably.

Built to Be Audit-Ready, Every Day

Modern document systems embed inspection readiness by default. With features like version control, approval logs, attestation tracking, and expiry reminders, organisations can demonstrate compliance at any time, without weeks of preparation.

This shifts governance from reactive to proactive, a key expectation of regulators and accreditation bodies such as CQC, HIQA, JCI, and the Joint Commission.

What Quality Leaders Should Ask

When considering document systems, directors of quality should ask:

• Does it integrate with other governance functions?

• Can it track and evidence staff accountability?

• Is it built to be audit-ready, every day?

• Does it help staff access answers, not just files?

These questions move the focus from administrative storage to governance leadership.

Final Thought

Document management is no longer an administrative afterthought. Done well, it underpins culture, consistency, and compliance. Done poorly, it leaves staff in the dark and organisations exposed.

The challenge for healthcare leaders is to ensure their document system isn’t just a graveyard for policies, but a dynamic driver of quality and safety.

👉 In Part 3, we’ll explore how leaders are already making this shift, drawing lessons from real-world implementations and showing how integrated systems can support a culture of continuous improvement.

---

Watch the On-Demand Webinar

In this post, we explored how healthcare organisations can turn document systems from static repositories into a dynamic driver of quality and safety.

For a deeper dive, watch our on-demand webinar: “Is Your Document System Driving Improvement, Or Just Storing Policies?”

Featuring Clare Harney (Head of Advisory & Education Services at Santegic) and Leonora O’Brien (Chief Growth Officer at MEG), the session explores:

• How to move beyond storage and build governance-ready systems

• Practical steps for integrating documents with audits, risk, and training

• The role of AI and attestation in driving compliance and accountability

[Part 1] The Digital Document Graveyard: Why Legacy Systems Still Put Healthcare at Risk

The dusty binders may be gone. Walk into most hospitals today, and you’ll find fewer filing cabinets stuffed with outdated policies. Instead, the graveyard has moved online.

Today’s “document graveyard” is SharePoint sites, intranet folders, and static PDF repositories. Policies technically exist in digital form, but for frontline staff, they might as well be buried six feet under. Clunky navigation, siloed folders, and poor search functionality mean that critical documents are effectively invisible when they’re needed most.

The risks are no less real than in the paper era. They may be greater. When leaders believe they’ve modernised simply because documents are “online,” they risk overlooking the ways these legacy digital systems fail to protect staff, patients, and the organisation itself.

Clinical Risk: When ‘Online’ Isn’t Accessible

In healthcare settings, SharePoint and intranet-based repositories were an important first step in moving away from paper-based policy management. But they were never designed for the complex demands of modern healthcare. These systems are effective at storing documents, yet storage alone isn’t enough when staff and regulators need instant access, clear version control, and evidence of staff attestation.

The result?

❌ Staff waste valuable time scrolling through endless lists of documents.
❌ Different teams create duplicate versions, leading to confusion about which is correct.
❌ Staff rely on memory, peer advice, or outdated hard copies because they can’t reliably find what they need.

Clinical risk doesn’t just come from the absence of policies. It also comes from policies that staff can’t quickly find, trust, or use.

““Healthcare can’t afford to treat policy management as an administrative afterthought. Outdated or inaccessible documents don’t just create inefficiency, they put patients, staff, and organisations at real risk.””

— — Clare Harney, Healthcare Policy Expert

Compliance Risk: Regulators Aren’t Fooled

Healthcare regulators expect more than “documents stored somewhere online.” All require clear version control, audit trails, and demonstrable accessibility as a minimum standard.

Legacy systems often fall short:

• Multiple versions of the same policy may live in different folders.

• No reliable audit trail shows who reviewed or approved changes.

• Surveyors asking “show me the policy” are met with frantic searches and uncertain results.

Most critically: attestation is nearly impossible.

• SharePoint and intranets can’t track whether staff have actually opened, read, and acknowledged a policy.

• There’s no way to assign policies to specific roles and capture individual attestations.

• Leaders are left hoping staff are compliant — but with no evidence to prove it when regulators ask.

In compliance terms, “we emailed it” or “it’s in SharePoint” doesn’t demonstrate accountability. Regulators want to see that staff received, read, and signed off on policies — and that organizations can prove it with a clear audit trail.

Cultural Risk: The Cost of Mistrust

Culture is built on trust. Staff need to believe that leadership equips them with the tools and information to succeed.

When staff can’t reliably find policies, frustration grows. Over time, disengagement sets in. They create workarounds, pass around shadow documents, or simply rely on “what we’ve always done.”

This doesn’t just weaken compliance; it corrodes culture. Staff begin to assume leadership doesn’t prioritise their needs. That mistrust spreads, undermining safety culture and reducing adherence to policies across the board.

A graveyard system doesn’t just bury documents. It buries staff morale.

The Illusion of Modernisation

The danger of legacy digital systems is that they create a false sense of progress. Leaders may think, “We’ve digitised our policies, so we’re fine.”

But digitisation is not the same as accessibility. Putting binders online doesn’t solve the problem; it only relocates it.

If a nurse spends 10 minutes searching for the infection control policy…
If a compliance officer can’t instantly demonstrate the current version to an inspector or accreditation surveyor…
If a new junior doctor downloads an outdated PDF from a shared drive…

…then the system isn’t modern. It’s a digital graveyard, and the risks are very much alive.

Why This Matters Now

Healthcare is under more pressure than ever:

• Staffing shortages mean new hires must be onboarded quickly and reliably.

• Regulatory scrutiny is increasing, with zero tolerance for “we couldn’t find it.”

• Patient safety demands require information that is trusted, consistent, and easy to locate in the moment of need.

Legacy digital systems were an important step away from paper, but they simply weren’t built for this environment. What’s needed is not just digitisation, but transformation: systems designed for findability, trust, and accountability.

Retiring the Digital Graveyard

It’s time to face reality: SharePoint and other intranet repositories were built for document storage, not for the complex demands of healthcare policy management. They remain useful as general collaboration tools, but they can’t provide the speed, visibility, and proof that today’s healthcare environment requires.

Healthcare leaders must demand more:

• Powerful search that delivers the right policy in seconds.

• Real-time version control that eliminates duplicates and confusion.

• Audit trails and reporting that satisfy regulators.

• Attestation tools that prove staff have read and understood critical policies.

The graveyard metaphor still applies but the solution is clear. Policies must be living documents, searchable in seconds, validated by audit trails, and supported by staff attestations.

Conclusion

The binders may be gone, but the graveyard remains. It lives in outdated digital systems that are siloed, clunky, and difficult to search with confidence.

Legacy systems multiply clinical, compliance, and cultural risks. And in a healthcare environment where every second counts, that’s unacceptable.

Healthcare leaders must move beyond the illusion of digitisation. Retiring the digital graveyard means adopting policy management systems that are dynamic, searchable, and accountable.

Because when policies are buried, whether in basements, in outdated PDFs, or in SharePoint with no proof they’ve been read, risk comes to life.

👉 In Part 2, we’ll explore how MEG transforms document management from a passive repository into a living, connected quality engine, giving healthcare leaders the tools to reduce risk, improve compliance, and empower staff with information they can trust.

---

Watch the On-Demand Webinar

Want to explore practical steps for moving beyond the “digital graveyard”? Watch our on-demand webinar:

“Is Your Document System Driving Improvement, Or Just Storing Policies?”
🎙 Featuring Clare Harney, Head of Advisory & Education Services at Santegic, and Leonora O’Brien, Chief Growth Officer at MEG